Green Sukuk and Indonesia's Green Economy: A Maqasid Energy Assessment
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indonesia's sovereign green sukuk has grown rapidly, but existing studies rarely distinguish direct clean-energy financing from adaptation-oriented green infrastructure. This study addresses that gap by examining whether the cumulative allocation portfolio supports Indonesia's energy transition and maqasid-based public benefit. Using official Green Sukuk Allocation and Impact Reports published from 2019 to 2025, the study combines document analysis with three transparent indicators: the Core Clean-Energy Ratio, the Broader Energy-Transition Ratio, and sectoral HHI. Global issuance reached USD6.60 billion and domestic issuance IDR71.77 trillion by 2024. Core clean-energy allocation was 8.93%, rising to 30.54% when sustainable transport was included; water and climate resilience accounted for 69.19%. Project reports show measurable benefits, including solar generation and reported transport emission reductions, but actual and expected impacts are not interchangeable. The findings indicate that green sukuk strongly advances hifz al-nafs, hifz al-mal, and adaptation, while its direct clean-energy contribution remains moderate. The study contributes a replicable classification and transition-intensity framework and recommends preserving adaptation finance while expanding bankable clean-energy projects and comparable impact disclosure.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
How to Cite
References
Alam, A., Tri Ratnasari, R., Latifathul Jannah, I., & El Ashfahany, A. (2023). Development and evaluation of Islamic green financing: A systematic review of green sukuk. Environmental Economics, 14(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(1).2023.06
Alessi, L., Duranovic, A., Kvedaras, V., & Monasterolo, I. (2025). From risks to opportunities: The impact of green public investment programs on sovereign yields. Research in International Business and Finance, 77, 102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102866
Alhaq, K., Nursyamsiah, T., & Muthohharoh, M. (2023). Green Sukuk Development Strategy in Indonesia: ANP-SWOT Approach. IQTISHADIA, 16(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v16i1.16312
Bai, R., & Lin, B. (2023). Nexus between green finance development and green technological innovation: A potential way to achieve the renewable energy transition. Renewable Energy, 218, 119295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119295
Chavarría-Flores, A., & Warren, P. (2024). Sovereign climate bonds: Policy innovation for just transitions in developing countries. Journal of Climate Finance, 7, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100041
Chu, L. K. (2024). Towards achieving energy transition goal: How do green financial policy, environmental tax, economic complexity, and globalization matter?. Renewable Energy, 222, 119933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119933
Endri, E., Tahya Hania, B., & Ma’ruf, A. (2022). Corporate green Sukuk issuance for sustainable financing in Indonesia. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.04
Ge, P., Liu, Y., Tang, C., & Zhu, R. (2025). Green bonds and corporate Environmental social and governance performance: Innovative approaches to identifying greenwashing in green bond markets. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 1060-1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3005
Hossain, M. R., Rao, A., Sharma, G. D., Dev, D., & Kharbanda, A. (2024). Empowering energy transition: Green innovation, digital finance, and the path to sustainable prosperity through green finance initiatives. Energy Economics, 136, 107736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107736
Hunt, J. P. (2024). Green Bond Reporting. Columbia Business Law Review, 2024(1). https://doi.org/10.52214/cblr.v2024i1.13004
Hwang, Y. K., & Sánchez Díez, Á. (2024). Renewable energy transition and green growth nexus in Latin America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 198, 114431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114431
Khalilurrahman, K., & Mubarrak, H. (2022). Retail Green Sukuk in Indonesia: Toward A Maqashid Approach. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 11(1), 208-228. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v11i1.12460
Kilinc, N., & Proskuryakova, L. N. (2024). The contribution of energy policies to green energy transition in the Asia-Pacific region. Renewable Energy, 237, 121797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121797
Lee, E., Kim, J. Y., & Lee, Y. (2025). A comparative analysis of green sukuk and green bonds. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(6), 1353-1373. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-12-2024-0609
Liu, F. H. M., & Lai, K. P. Y. (2021). Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1896-1914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211038349
Liu, Y., Fu, S., Liu, G., & Huang, X. (2026). Green Bond Issuance and Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Signaling or Greenwashing?. Journal of Business Ethics, 204(4), 825-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06089-4
Mauliyah, N. I., Hasanah, H., & Hasanah, M. (2023). Potensi Pengembangan Green Sukuk dan Aspek Hukum di Indonesia. Ekonomica Sharia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah, 8(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.36908/esha.v8i2.701
Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia (2025). 2025 Green Sukuk Allocation and Impact Report. https://api-djppr.kemenkeu.go.id/web/api/v1/media/8C2C3353-9134-43B3-9307-D465DE7C2CB8
Musari, K., & Hidayat, S. E. (2023). The Role of Green Sukuk in Maqasid Al-Shariah and SDGs: Evidence from Indonesia. Palgrave CIBFR Studies in Islamic Finance, 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13302-2_9
Owusu-Mante, S., Chi, K. H. K., & Gopalakrishnan, T. (2025). Sovereign green bonds in practice: effectiveness as a climate finance instrument in emerging economies. Climate Policy, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2586572
Prayogo, S. M. S., Raditya, A., & Sarea, A. (2024). A Bibliometric analysis of green sukuk literature. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 184-198. https://doi.org/10.20885/risfe.vol3.iss2.art6
Rahim, R., Rathore, H. S., Rabbani, M. R., & Alam, M. N. (2024). Maqasid Al-Shariah and Green Finance: A Theoretical Framework on Islamic Finance with Sustainable Development Goals for a Greener Future. 2024 International Conference on Sustainable Islamic Business and Finance (SIBF), 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1109/sibf63788.2024.10883847
Republic of Indonesia (2017). Indonesia Green Bond and Green Sukuk Framework. https://api-djppr.kemenkeu.go.id/web/api/v1/media/B51F74A2-F8BF-47C7-A77F-DA48C2D33067
Riaz, T., Selamat, A. I., Nor, N. M., & Hassan, A. F. S. (2024). DO INVESTORS GET BENEFITS FROM CORPORATE GREEN SUKUK ISSUANCE. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 10(3), 445-470. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v10i3.1944
Rozman, A. T., & Azmi, N. A. (2022). Green Sukuk, Environmental Issues and Strategy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1), 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012085
Satyakti, Y. (2023). The Effect of Applying Sustainability (Maqasid Shariah) and Competition on Islamic Bank Financing. Sustainability, 15(17), 12994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712994
Sun, G., Li, G., Dilanchiev, A., & Kazimova, A. (2023). Promotion of green financing: Role of renewable energy and energy transition in China. Renewable Energy, 210, 769-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.044
Wang, H., & Shen, H. (2024). Self-restraint or external supervision: Green bond issuance and greenwashing. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102402
Wang, S., Sun, L., & Iqbal, S. (2022). Green financing role on renewable energy dependence and energy transition in E7 economies. Renewable Energy, 200, 1561-1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.067
Yang, J., Shi, Y., Zhang, L., & Hu, S. (2023). The influence of environmental information transparency of green bond on credit rating. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104410